Needs Analysis for the Development of an Electronic Module Based on Discovery Learning Assisted by Generative AI (ChatGPT) Animated Videos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67919/joslepi.v4i2.216Keywords:
animated videos, Discovery Learning, electronic module, Generative AI, needs analysisAbstract
This study aims to analyze the need for developing an electronic module based on Discovery Learning assisted by Generative AI (ChatGPT) animated videos as an innovative digital learning resource. The research employed a quantitative descriptive survey design involving teachers and students as respondents to identify current learning conditions and expected characteristics of the proposed product. Data were collected using a five-point Likert-scale needs questionnaire covering learning conditions, electronic modules, Discovery Learning, animated videos, Generative AI, and multimedia integration, and were analyzed using descriptive percentage analysis. The results indicate a substantial gap between current learning conditions and respondents’ expectations for technology-integrated learning resources. In addition, animated videos, multimedia integration, Generative AI utilization, and Discovery Learning emerged as major components required in the proposed electronic module. The findings suggest that integrating these components can provide a relevant framework for designing interactive, visual, and student-centered learning resources. In conclusion, the needs analysis provides an empirical foundation for developing the proposed electronic module. This study contributes to technology-enhanced learning design and recommends further product development, expert validation, classroom implementation, and effectiveness testing.
Downloads
References
Aldilla, E., Ulfa, J., Desnita, D., & Usmeldi, U. (2023). Needs analysis for physics e-module development on work and energy materials in senior high school. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 11(3), 257–266. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v11i3.10952
Aldilla, E., & Usmeldi, U. (2024). Validity and practicality of the physics e-module based on the Orientation, Identify, Discussion, Decision, and Engage in Behavior model to improve students' 21st century skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(8), 5768–5774. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i8.7719
Alfarwan, A. (2025). Generative AI use in K–12 education: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1647573. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1647573
Asrizal, Nazifah, N., Effendi, H., & Helma. (2024). STEM-Smart Physics E-Module to promote conceptual understanding and 4C skills of students. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 14(2), 279–286. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2024.14.2.2049
Astuti, L. D., Damayanti, I. S., & Budiawanti, S. (2024). Needs analysis of electronic module based on PBL to improve students collaboration skills. Kasuari: Physics Education Journal, 7(2), 409–416. https://doi.org/10.37891/kpej.v7i2.753
Caella, L. A., & Yulianto, S. (2024). The effectiveness of animation video media to increase interest and learning outcomes in science subjects. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(9), 6621–6630. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i9.8445
Chairatunnisa, A., Marlina, L., & Wiyono, K. (2024). Analysis of the need for developing e-modules based on problem-based learning on heat transfer material for middle school students. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 12(1), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v12i1.17403
Chen, S., & Cheung, A. C. K. (2025). Effect of generative artificial intelligence on university students' learning outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 49, 100737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100737
Cheung, K. K. C., Zerouali, A., Koenen, J., & Erduran, S. (2025). Do generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) and science education mix? A systematic review of the literature. Studies in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2025.2578091
Daniel, K., Msambwa, M. M., & Wen, Z. (2025). Can generative AI revolutionise academic skills development in higher education? A systematic literature review. European Journal of Education, 60, e70036. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70036
Dewi, E. R., & Tyas, D. N. (2024). Development of Sparkol Videoscribe-based animated video learning media on the subject of IPAS material changes in the form of substances. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(7), 3622–3632. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i7.7423
Dewi, I. K. P., Sulistiawati, & Lubis, P. H. M. (2024). Pengembangan e-modul fisika berbasis project based learning untuk meningkatkan kemampuan menganalisis siswa SMK. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 13(1), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpf.v13i1.49111
Garofalo, S. G., & Farenga, S. J. (2025). Science teacher perceptions of the state of knowledge and education at the advent of generative artificial intelligence popularity. Science & Education, 34, 893–912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00534-y
Ghadzia, G., Husna, H., & Yanti, I. R. (2023). The development of physics e-module based on Discovery Learning on optics materials in senior high schools. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 11(2), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v11i2.8329
Govindasamy, P., Cumming, T. M., & Abdullah, N. (2024). Validity and reliability of a needs analysis questionnaire for the development of a creativity module. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 24, 637–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12659
Harahap, N. I., Hakim, R., Rayendra, & Ridwan. (2024). Development of physics learning e-module for class X high school students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(7), 3689–3696. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i7.7548
Hayati, F., Novitra, F., Mufit, F., & Suherman, D. S. (2025). Needs analysis of physics e-modules based on Dual Space Inquiry Framework to stimulate students' creative thinking ability on static fluid material. Physics Learning and Education, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.24036/ple.v3i3.231
Hendrawensi, Hidayati, A., Yeni, F., & Zurwina. (2024). Development of electronic module (e-module) based on case method in science subjects at junior high school. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(6), 3486–3492. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i6.6796
Irsalina, F. R., Aviyanti, L., & Iryanti, M. (2026). Needs analysis of interactive physics e-modules in senior high school to develop students' higher-order thinking skills and self-regulated learning. JPPIPA (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA), 10(2), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.26740/jppipa.v10n2.p147-156
Khan, N., & Saunderson, S. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence in education: A narrative literature review. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v16i2.9217
Lin, X., & Tan, H. (2025). A systematic review of generative AI in K–12: Mapping goals, activities, roles, and outcomes via the 3P model. Systems, 13(10), 840. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13100840
Maghfiroh, S., Wilujeng, I., Jumadi, & Masyitha, D. (2023). Development of physics e-module based on Discovery Learning to improve students' scientific literacy. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(2), 447–453. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i2.1733
Marisda, D. H., et al. (2024). Needs analysis in the development of basic physics practical e-module based on interactive flipbook with STEM approach. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 9(3), 404. https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v9i3.5583
Marzano, D. (2026). Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) in teaching and learning processes at the K–12 level: A systematic review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 31, 789–829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-025-09853-7
Monteiro, F. F., Souza, P. V. S., da Silva, M. C., Maia, J. R., da Silva, W. F., & Girardi, D. (2024). ChatGPT in Brazilian K–12 science education. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1321547. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1321547
Ng, D. T. K., Tan, C. W., & Leung, J. K. L. (2024). Empowering student self-regulated learning and science education through ChatGPT: A pioneering pilot study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(4), 1328–1353. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13454
Nilyani, K., Anjani, H. R., Desnita, & Usmeldi. (2023). Needs analysis to develop physics learning e-modules on static electricity material. Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.24036/jep/vol7-iss2/781
Ogunleye, B., Zakariyyah, K. I., Ajao, O., Olayinka, O., & Sharma, H. (2024). A systematic review of generative AI for teaching and learning practice. Education Sciences, 14(6), 636. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060636
Putri, R. M., & Asrizal. (2023). Need analysis of developing digital teaching materials to improve 21st century skills. Jurnal IPA & Pembelajaran IPA, 7(2), 108–117. https://doi.org/10.24815/jipi.v7i2.29797
Rabiasa, S. A., Paramata, D. D., Yusuf, M., Odja, A. H., Supartin, & Setiawan, D. G. E. (2024). Development of animated video learning media in increasing learning interest of deaf students at special schools. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(7), 4327–4332. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i7.8000
Rahmawati, F., Sarwanto, & Budiawanti, S. (2021). Needs analysis of physics e-module based on hybrid-PBL model on critical thinking skills improvement. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v5i2.5740
Tang, K. S. (2024). Informing research on generative artificial intelligence from a language and literacy perspective: A meta-synthesis of studies in science education. Science Education, 108, 1329–1355. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21875
Udyaningsih, P. S., Suharno, & Budiawanti, S. (2024). Needs analysis for a STEM Discovery Learning-based e-module in static electricity. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2866, 012102. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2866/1/012102
Wu, F., Dang, Y., & Li, M. (2025). A systematic review of responses, attitudes, and utilization behaviors on generative AI for teaching and learning in higher education. Behavioral Sciences, 15(4), 467. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15040467
Wulandari, M., & Jumadi. (2023). Analysis of the use of e-modules to support students' abilities in learning physics in high schools: Systematic literature review. EduFisika: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 8(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.59052/edufisika.v8i1.23317
Yeadon, W., & Hardy, T. (2024). The impact of AI in physics education: A comprehensive review from GCSE to university levels. Physics Education, 59(2), 025010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ad1fa2
Yusuf, A., Pervin, N., Román-González, M., & Noor, N. M. (2024). Generative AI in education and research: A systematic mapping review. Review of Education, 12, e3489. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3489
Zhang, P., & Tur, G. (2024). A systematic review of ChatGPT use in K–12 education. European Journal of Education, 59(2), e12599. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12599
Zhang, X., Zhang, P., Shen, Y., Liu, M., Wang, Q., Gašević, D., & Fan, Y. (2024). A systematic literature review of empirical research on applying generative artificial intelligence in education. Frontiers of Digital Education, 1(3), 223–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44366-024-0028-5
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aden, Jessy Fitrianti, Dedi Irawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
