ENHANCING HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING OF ENERGY SOURCES THROUGH THE SETS LEARNING MODEL
Keywords:
Conceptual Understanding, Energy Resources, Physics Learning, Senior High School Students, SETS Learning ModelAbstract
This study investigates the effectiveness of the Science, Environment, Technology, and Society (SETS) learning model in improving senior high school students’ conceptual understanding of energy resources. The study was motivated by the low level of students’ conceptual understanding in physics learning, which is often caused by teacher-centered instruction, limited contextual learning experiences, and the lack of integration between scientific concepts and real-life phenomena. The research employed a quantitative approach using a quasi-experimental method with a posttest-only nonequivalent control group design. The population consisted of tenth-grade students at SMA IT Al Fikri Islamic Green School Pekanbaru during the 2025/2026 academic year. Two classes comprising 58 students were selected as research samples through random sampling. The experimental group was taught using the SETS learning model, while the control group received conventional instruction. Data were collected through a conceptual understanding test consisting of 21 multiple-choice questions covering the indicators of translation, interpretation, and extrapolation. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistical techniques, including the Independent Samples t-test. The findings revealed that students in the experimental class achieved significantly higher conceptual understanding scores than those in the control class. The average score of the experimental group was categorized as good, whereas the control group only reached the sufficient category. Statistical analysis showed a significance value below 0.05, indicating a significant difference between the two groups. Therefore, the SETS learning model can be considered an effective instructional approach for enhancing students’ conceptual understanding of energy resource concepts in physics learning.
Downloads
References
Afni, N., Wahid, A., Hastati, S., Jumrah, A. M., & Mursidin, M. (2021). Development of 21st century learning models at SD Negeri 126 Borong, Herlang District, Bulukumba Regency. Madaniya, 2(2), 137-142.
Arikunto. (2009). Educational Psychology. Bandung: Pt. Remaja Rodaskarya
Anggreni, I. G. A. S., Wiarta, I. W., & Putra, D. K. N. S. (2020). The Effect of Learning Models (SAVI) Based on (ICT) on Mathematical Knowledge Competence. Journal of Pedagogy and Learning, 3(1), 15-24.
Anjeli, C., Azhar, & Irawan, D. (2024). Application of think pair share type cooperative learning model with use ICM (Index Card Match) strategy to improve the ability to understand the concepts of students in class X SMAN 2 Singingi. Journal of Science, Learning Process and Instructional Research, 2(1), 11–19.
cici elizabeth, Irawan, D., & Collette, & Chiappetta. (1994). Pembelajaran sains di sekolah menengah pertama dan atas. (Data penerbit tidak tercantum pada daftar yang Anda lampirkan).
Elyana, Y. M., Mannan, Y., & Fakhruddin. (2017). Analysis higher order thinking skills (HOTS) student MAN 2 Model Pekanbaru in problem solving of physic national exam. Journal Online Mahasiswa, 4(11), 1–9.
Febrianty, W., et al. (2023). Eksplorasi konsep fisika kesetimbangan benda tegar pada permainan tradisional engklek sebagai bahan pembelajaran fisika. OPTIKA: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 7(1), 09–20.
Firdaus, F., Pathoni, H., & Alrizal, A. (2023). Analisis kebutuhan peserta didik terhadap media pembelajaran sebagai acuan pengembangan video pembelajaran berbasis pendekatan STEM pada materi pengukuran. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 13(3), 90–96.
Gunawan, I., & Palupi, A. R. (2016). Taksonomi Bloom – revisi ranah kognitif: Kerangka landasan untuk pembelajaran, pengajaran, dan penilaian. Premiere Educandum: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar dan Pembelajaran, 2(02), 99–117.
Jainiyah, Jainiyah, Fahrudin, F., Ismiasih, Ismiasih, & Ulfah, M. (2023). Peranan guru dalam meningkatkan motivasi belajar siswa. Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia, 2(6), 4–9.
Khasanah, N. (2013). SETS (science, environmental, technology and society) sebagai pendekatan pembelajaran IPA modern pada Kurikulum 2013. (Hal. 270–277). (Sumber/prosiding/jurnal tidak tercantum pada daftar yang Anda lampirkan).
Masgumelar, N. K., & Mustafa, P. S. (2021). Teori belajar konstruktivisme dan implikasinya dalam pendidikan dan pembelajaran. GHAITSA: Islamic Education Journal, 2(1), 49–57.
Parwati, N. N., Suryawan, I. P. P., & Apsari, R. A. (2023). Belajar dan pembelajaran. PT RajaGrafindo Persada–Rajawali Pers.
Puspita Sari, Giarti, Tandililing, E., & Oktavianty, E. (2020). Analisis kesulitan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal fisika materi usaha dan energi di SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 7(10), 1–10.
Rahman, et al. (2022). Pengertian_Pendidikan_Ilmu_Pendidikan_Da. l-Urwatul Wutsqa: Kajian Pendidikan Islam, 2(1), 1–8.
Rohmatun, H., & Rasyid, A. (2022). Model pembelajaran SETS (science, environment, technologi, society) berbantuan media video terhadap pemaham konsep siswa. Seminar Nasional
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 jenita, Zulhelmi, M. Rahmat

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.










